Number
093-EN
Section
General Section
Use
Sector
Health services
Scientific research and development
Function
Durability agent
Embalming agent
Process
Manual activities involving hand contact
Product category
laboratory chemicals
Application
Cancer research
Abstract
70% ethanol fixation and paraffin embedding is a useful alternative method for molecular profiling studies. This was shown during a systematic approach of processing clinical tissue specimen (prostate and kidney) through non-formalin fixation method.
Substituted substances
Formaldehyde
CAS No. 50-00-0 EC No. 200-001-8 Index No. 605-001-00-5
Chemical group
Aldehyde
Classification: hazard statements
H350 May cause cancer
H341 Suspected of causing genetic defects
H331 Toxic if inhaled
H311 Toxic in contact with skin
H301 Toxic if swallowed
H314 Causes severe skin burns and eye damage
H317 May cause an allergic skin reaction
Other adverse effects
The substance is: 1 carcinogen (IARC) as listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORT Screening Criteria (SDSC).
Alternative Substances
Ethanol
CAS No. 64-17-5 EC No. 200-578-6 Index No. 603-002-00-5
Chemical group
Alcohol
Classification: hazard statements
H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour
Other adverse effects
The substance is: 1 carcinogen (IARC), as listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORT Screening Criteria (SDSC).
Reason substitution
CMR
skin/respiratory sensitizing
Other type of alternative
Snap freezing
Hazard Assessment
Substance to be substituted: Formaldehyde is in the database of hazardous substances according to SUBSPORTplus criteria. Formaldehyde is a sensitiser, may cause cancer, is toxic if swallowed, is toxic in contact with skin, causes severe skin burns and eye damage, is toxic if inhaled and is suspected of causing genetic defects. Alternative substance: Ethanol is flammable and a group 1 carcinogen (IARC), as listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORTplus Screening Criteria (SDSC). The hazard of the non-chemical alternative is not assessed in SUBSPORTplus.
Description of Substitution
Concerning histology the aim of the study was to use a systematic approach to evaluate the biomolecular status of a number of clinical tissue specimens processed through a non-formalin fixation method. 50 radical prostatectomies (tissue from prostate) were fixed in 70% ethanol and studied at the National Cancer Institute. In five of these cases, the specimen was subdivided and processed through four separate methods (snap freezing, ethanol fixation, paraffin embedding) and these four methods were compared. The conclusion was, that clinical diagnosis was possible with all methods. Also ethanol fixation was comparable to formalin fixation and superior to snap freezing. The polyester wax was difficult to use for large specimens. Following you will find a citation of the summary from the article: "Many commercially available antibodies have been selected for use on formalin fixed tissue. The investigators therefore have to assess the performance using ethanol instead. Using a general strategy for evaluating clinical tissue specimens, we found that 70% ethanol fixation and paraffin embedding is a useful method for molecular profiling studies. Human prostate and kidney were used as test tissues. The protein content of the samples was analysed by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis, immunoblot, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and layered expression scanning. In each case, the fixed and embedded tissues produced results similar to that obtained from snap-frozen specimens, although the protein quantity was somewhat decreased. Recovery of mRNA was reduced in both quantity and quality in the ethanol-fixed samples, but was superior to that obtained from formalin-fixed samples and sufficient to perform reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions. Recovery of DNA from ethanol-fixed specimens was superior to formalin-fixed samples as determined by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis and polymerase chain reaction. In conclusion, specimens fixed in 70% ethanol and embedded in paraffin produce good histology and permit recovery of DNA, mRNA, and proteins sufficient for several downstream molecular analyses. "
Case/substitution evaluation
This study shows that there are technical feasible and safer alternatives to formaldehyde. The substitute ethanol is suitable in this case although it is carcinogenic, it is still less harmful to human health.
Availability of Alternative
Available
Type of information supplier
Research
Type of publication and availability
Freely available from link
Publication source: author, company, institute, year
Gillespie John W. et al: Evaluation of Non-Formalin Tissue Fixation for Molecular Profiling Studies. American Journal of Pathology. Vol. 160. No 2. February 2002. 449-457
Publication source
Type of publication and availability
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1850633/
Date, reviewed
December 11, 2020