Substitution of nitric acid to citric and acetic acid in sugar production.

Number

204-EN

Section

General Section

Use

Sector

Manufacture of food products

Function

Cleaning agent

Process

Manual maintenance(cleaning and repair) of machinery

Product category

washing ad cleaning products

Application

Production facility cleaning in sugar refinery

Abstract

Nakskov Sugar Mill have successfully substituted nitric acid with citric- and acetic acid in cleaning their production equipment.

Substituted substances

Nitric acid

CAS No. 7697-37-2 EC No. 231-714-2 Index No. 007-004-00-1

Chemical group

Mineral acid

Classification: hazard statements

H272 May intensify fire; oxidiser
H331 Toxic if inhaled
H314 Causes severe skin burns and eye damage

Other adverse effects

Strong inorganic acid mists: 1 carcinogen (IARC) as listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORT Screening Criteria (SDSC).

Alternative Substances

Acetic acid

CAS No. 64-19-7 EC No. 200-580-7 Index No. 607-002-00-6

Chemical group

Organic acid

Classification: hazard statements

H226 Flammable liquid and vapour
H314 Causes severe skin burns and eye damage

Citric acid, anhydrous

CAS No. 77-92-9 EC No. 201-069-1 Index No.

Chemical group

Carboxylic acid

Classification: hazard statements

H335 May cause respiratory irritation
H319 Causes serious eye irritation

Reliability of information

Evidence of implementation: there is evidence that the solution was implemented and in use at time of publication

Reason substitution

skin/respiratory sensitizing

Hazard Assessment

Substance to be substituted: Nitric acid is not listed in the SUBSPORTplus Database and has no harmonised classification according to Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation). Alternative substances: Acetic acid is not listed in the SUBSPORTplus Database. Citric acid, anhydrous has no harmonised classification according to Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation). Highly concentrated solutions with organic acids should still be handled with care, but they are stillsafer than nitric acid.

Description of Substitution

In the past, Nakskov Sugar Mill used nitric acid to clean production equipment, but substituted it with citric acid and acetic acid. This substitution still works fine. Nakskov Sugar Mill has a general goal to reduce the number of hazard-labelled chemicals in their production - in view of both simplicity and a better occupational health. The satisfaction of the project among the employees has been high. Sugar extraction requires a list of subsidiary chemicals, amongst others hydrochloric and nitric acid for cleaning production equipment. The discoveries of citric- and acetic acid as suitable substituents were made at the company’s own premises, and the project only took 3 month to carry out. No difficulties were experienced during the process. The substitutions had minimal effect on the production and production expenses, and they could still use the same suppliers. Some of the production workers were worried that citric- and acetic acid would not prove to be as efficient as nitric acid against calcification of the equipment, but testing convinced them otherwise. Now Nakskov Sugar Mill recommends other sugar mills to perform the same substitution. At the time the substitution was implemented, Nakskov Sugar Mill was a member of the Danisco Group. Danisco have since been purchased by Du Pont and Nakskov Sugar Mill have become a member of the Nordzucker Group. The substitution was implemented at all Danisco´s Sugar Mills before the organizational changes.

Case/substitution evaluation

An example of a successful substitution with both environmental and personal safety benefits.

State of implementation

In use

Date and place of implementation

Before 2006

Enterprise using the alternative

https://www.nordzucker.com/unternehmen/ueber-nordzucker/unsere-standorte/nakskov-dk.html

Availability of Alternative

On the market

Producer/Provider

Type of information supplier

User

Contact

The Ecological Council www.ecocouncil.dk

Type of publication and availability

Free publication

Date, reviewed

November 26, 2021